| the2real4mafol said: The difference is that the GTX Titan cost $1000, PS4/ Xbox 720 will probably cost less than half of that. So who cares if it's 3x more powerful? It doesn't matter because it won't be used by developers at all |
It doesn't need to be "used" by developers. PC's aren't exactly limited to only a 1080P resolution and 2-4x Anti-Aliasing you know, just scale up that resolution, AA and AF and Titan will be utilised, heck it probably wouldn't maintain 60fps in Crysis 3 on my system.
| DraconianAC said: What's the the point of PC fanboys trolling on a console? Is their labido on the line or what? So PS fanboys are excited about their upcoming new toy, can't you pc fanboys leave it be? Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo/AMD are not going to hurt the industry, in fact they may help it. So why not drop the egos since we aren't talking about your sexual parts here, or are we? |
It's called "Karma". The same thing occured when the PS3 launched, how Cell was so powerfull that the PC couldn't ever match it. - I recall a similar thing when the PS2 launched too, in the end it turned out to be hogwash.
In-fact since the Xbox 360 and PS3 launched, one of the Pro's was how much "better" the graphics were on the PS3 compared to the Xbox.
Not only was the difference neglible... But if you gamed on a PC, you realise how horrible the graphics really were on consoles.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
