theprof00 said:
I speak rationally during civil discussion, which this is not. You make me uncomfortable. Not in the sense that I'm feeling attacked or anything, but in the sense that just by saying "it doesn't exist", you explode with assumptions, which isn't something I would find comfortable discussion. But, to indulge your question, it is very likely that phantom pain is not a game. I'm not talking about the concept of mgs5, I'm not talking about the fox engine, I'm not talking about ground zeros. None of those things ever entered the discussion. We're talking specifically the version of the game known as phantom pain. |
lol because "case closed" in every thing you write is rational and civil ;) Also being sarcastic in your posts would not be considered rational and civil.
YOu are basing your interpretations off of assumptions at the moment rather than telling me im assuming what you are saying. Id prefer Phantom Pains not to exist simply because we only need one game and not two. And yes it may or may not exist, who knows. If you explain things rather than being sarcastic I will not have to ask you anything at all.
