RazorDragon said:
| oniyide said:
SFxTekken is not a bad game at all, dont let Capcom's DLC crap cloud your mind. Tvs.C is overrated to me. MK was not a multiplatform game as the original version was released on PS2 and xbox in 06 how the hell could it have come out the same time if the Wii wasnt even on the market, im kinda questioning how big a fan you are. Guilty Gear game on wii is simply an enchanced version of a game that had been out forever, and it was still a month later than PS2 version but just by a month, if we are going to count that then we have to count the multiple addtions of other fighters and that would make the HD list even bigger. Naruto, IMHO those games are bland but you must not have played the last ones because it is not simplified, you might be in the minority there. What editions to those games on the collection were made? I have it and there was none, i think you are making stuff up. No most people didnt like Castlevania cause it was a crap fighting game, the fact that you like it tells me where your tastes lie. (nothing wrong with that) please lets not make excuses for bad games. Persona got a fighting spinoff and it was loved.
It is twice the number even without the super/ultimate editions. The fact that there is NO Street Fighter or Tekken presence on the system makes it a joke to fighting game fans.
|
Gameplay-wise SFxTekken isn't bad, I agree, but the choices they made with DLC content actually affected the gameplay and that threw me off completely. About MK, you're right, I didn't bother to look it up, the Wii version was released almost 1 year later. Guilty Gear XX Accent Core Plus offered significant new content compared to the previous versions, such as a story mode that continued where XX ended, complete with branching paths and new characters, so I guess it counts as a new game. I'm not a big fan of Naruto games, but I have played Ultimate Ninja Storm 2 and 1 on the PS3, and also Clash of Ninja 2 and 3 on the Wii. There's no concrete fact to make an argument here, but I found both of these games to have a simplified gameplay when compared to CoN 2 and 3 on the Wii, also, both of the PS3 games have unbalanced characters, which is a problem I didn't found on the Wii games. About the KoF Collection, I read about gameplay changes on some review. I'll try to look if I can find it and then i'll post the quote here.
Also, when Castlevania Judgement was released, I could only find posts talking about how it wasn't Castlevania. Actually, few people actually talked about the gameplay. As I fighter, I found the game enjoyable, specially when playing online. People have different opinions, though, so you're free to think it's crap or whatever, I respect your opinion.
Anyway, the system still had great fighters. Of course it wasn't the best of this generation in that specific genre, but it had worthwhile fighting games.
|
TBH i waited and got the Vita version of SFxT, so i never experienced the issues without those extra characters (Im sure there was, you cant lock that much characters away and not have balance issues.) The vita version had everything there and more.
Guitly Gear fair enough. Same with Naruto, we'll have to agree to disagree. KOF collection i wanna see this review because i bought that collection for Wii and there were not gameplay changes, its straight ports with galleries and music tracks. Ive bought all the games in the main series, even the atrocious 12.
Ive read actually Castlevania reviews and played the game and i can tell you most of those reviews were not saying how it wasnt a Castlevania game but how it was simply a mediocore at best fighters. To each his own.
IMHO, in terms of figthers i found it pretty terrible not even taking PS360 into account but older consoles. Tvs.C, Brawl?, GG? Those were the only "good" original fighters released, in that entire timeframe. When was the last tme a fighter was released? The only console that i could think that was worst was, n64
