Wright said:
Let's see if I understand this.
But you're missing the point, again. We were not comparing companies, nor comparing game quality. There's enough Uncharted vs Gears of war and Forza vs Gran Turismo in this generation already. But here, you said the following thing:
I (and yourself) have proven that yes, indeed, they have given us good games (and they keep doing so). So no, that statement does not stand. They want money? Of course. Sony and Nintendo want money too. But that is not the point, you see.
I, sir, have a case, I'm afraid. You keep going off the point. |
This keeps going in circles. You can list your fables and your halo's and your gears, aswell as those low profile games you mentioned. There is little to nothing of value in that list. Microsoft released what 3 high profile titles last year? It was just as bad in previous years aswell, except the first 2. They are always from the same series aswell.
You, just like i previously said, are playing coy cause you have no case. Here is what Microsoft has: Shooters, a mediocre RPG series and a racing series (wich i havent even played cause it looks so dull). They are rehashed time and again. That is all. Those little arcade games you mention dont even make a splash, nor things like crackdown, wich as admitidly mediocre. Microsoft only wants your money, they dont want to try to develop exciting new IP's and they dont care about trying new things. They will keep shoving you Halo's and gears as often as they can. Maybe for your thats good games, but for many of us, im sure it isnt. We want more than to be shoveled the same game time and again.
Again, i dont see where my statement was wrong. It is absolutely the case.







