Lawlight said:
dahuman said:
Lawlight said:
Tachikoma said:
Lawlight said:
No point in being technically advanced and not looking good.
|
Some SNES games looked great, i guess by your statement all consoles that came out after the SNES werent needed, because my view of the snes game looking good is all encompassing, right?
You're just arguing because you're a PS3 fan and don't like being told a Sony console is inferior in any way to something else.
|
I'm not seeing 16-bit-looking games winning a lot of best graphic awards these days. And if the PS3 was really inferior, I wouldn't be gaming on it.
|
By your standard, if the PS3 is so much superior in that sense, why is it that the most critically acclaimed game of the 7th gen console game is on the Wii? Apparently Super Mario Galaxy 2 proves that the Wii is king by your own merits, or it doesn't count because YOU don't think so and your opinion are absolute facts so other people don't matter? :P
http://www.metacritic.com/game/wii/super-mario-galaxy-2
88 Reviews, still 97
1189 User Ratings, and still sits at 9.2
|
One game? Is that all that it takes for a platform to be considered the best of its generation? The best system is the one that has the greatest amount of quality titles and that's, obviously, the PS3. Btw, GTA4 PS3 sits at 98 (and I think the game is terrible).
|
Not really just one game no, you can go browse the list :P I thought you were talking about exclusives for the most part and GTA4 is multiplat, and it's funny too because notice how I put user score in there too?
