| Kasz216 said: So in otherwords... you didn't read the post i linked to where they specifically said those women who were dancing at GDC were paid by the staging company and brought there without company approval like was written in their contract. They were paid to be there, they were paid to dress like that, and they were paid to dance on thebar.
So the proof had already been provided.
As for the last part... you are again missing the point spectacularly. It doesn't matter what was in their mind when they organized it. That's the message they sent.
|
You still have to prove that it results in the exclusion of women. Maybe you are not getting it.
And you still have to prove that the female dancers were comparable the the gay men scenario you provided. I don't think they are. Which is why I kept saying that your comparison is getting overboard when you compared this to meetings in strip clubs.
And no, that is not the message they sent. The person who sends the message knows about it MORE than the person who receives it. Fact.
The person receiving it can have the wrong interpretation, he can misunderstand it, there are many possibilities, so really. The person sending the message knows more about it than anyone else.
Racist people are determined to be racists based on their actions. Here we are not interpreting actions, we are doing something entirely else - trying to see what "message" they are trying to send because obviously having female dancers mean someone is trying to send a message.
Not every action has a message behind it.
