Kasz216 said:
Then they went with the same people who did it last year.... on the condition that everything they did was approved first. Except some of it wasn't approved like it was supposed to be. Hence the issue. Again, the tone they are taking is 100% different from companies who fuck up and don't think they did fuck up. You're just wrong. They had an issue with it last year as well... and had stated as much. |
Okay. So they went with the same people who did the work last year, and forgot to take care that they don't approve stuff that was the reason they changed providers.
So they were careless. Whatever.
I have drifted a long way from my original point by now. It is not sexist because there is no discrimination. You are not entitled to some male or female dancer on the stage of the organization. The only reason people are even seeing "sexism" here is because they are looking at it with a perspective that deliberately makes them the victim or insults them. Women dance with scanty clothes? That means they think I can't do anything else!
There would have been no argument whatsover if there were only male dancers. Actually maybe these people who are complaining might have complained that there were only male dancers and that it is sexist hence.







