wfz said:
Skrunch-a-tron said:
PlaystaionGamer said: well look at that gun on the 3rd pic.. it looks awful. Killzone 2 and 3's guns look FAR better |
Don't be such a prick.
>User was banned for this post [RH]
|
Seriously? He was banned for this? I'm from the USA, someone please tell me which country the word "prick" is so offensive in? Besides, PlayStaionGamer was being quite a pri..er..hm, what other word is there to describe it? He was being rather obnoxious stating that Killzone 2 looks "FAR better" than BF3 when these pictures above are clearly high quality. The Killzone 2 guns don't look better than this by any technical means, imo. And remember, giving a lot of resources to certain objects means not having them in other areas. Killzone 2 had great guns but look at how amazing the entire scene looks in BF3.
And here's a shot from Killzone...

|
excuse me? how am i being a prick? i have already said the first 2 shots are amazing but that gun is no. thanks for posting that killzone 2 pick though! it back up my point compleatly. Thats killzone gun is far better.
reported.