By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 26 March 2013
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
oldschoolfool said:
the pc one looks way way better. I don't understand how this is even a question.

I'll make this simple, the PC one may look more "realistic", but it doesn't mean everyone is going to prefer it. This shouldn't even need to be pointed out (if you actually read and understood the OP).


Dude,  I read the entire OP and I didn't get that until you posted a few posts down that you wanted peoples opinion on which they liked more rather then looked better.   I'd consider editing your OP.

I figured the OP asked it very clearly:

"How does David Cage's demo stack up?". "No answer is the wrong answer".

Regardless, I think you didn't get what he was saying. He sees no reason for the comparison because the NVIDIA demo looks more realistic. It's not a problem for him to prefer one but find another more real, rather he implied they shouldn't be compared based on the technical advantages of the NVIDIA demo, which was silly to me. Behind the scenes, he cleared up his views, so all is well. 

If there had been a widespread misunderstanding of the OP, I would have edited it. But I don't see many struggling with the terms.


To me it sounded like you weren't going to critisize anyone for picking the wrong one and were curious more about what people THINK is impressive graphically vs what actually is.

 

Though perhaps it's just I have too many conversations with Trash who goes on about the distinction a lot talking about how games like God of War 3 and Unchararted 2 often are said to have the best "Graphics" when in reality while they look great, graphically from a technical standpoint they are actually pretty unimpressive due to closed off set piece enviroments... and it's better to just say they look great.  Since there are games on the systsem that are better graphically from a pure hardware point of view.  (the above 2 being about design.)