Mr Khan said:
You've really become more vitriolic in the last half-year, haven't you? Ultimately, the government's lack of control over the internet is only because A: the old guys that run the government still don't quite "get" the internet, and B: The profits of the internet's current relative freedom outweigh the costs (at the end of the day, even the big government guys know that piracy really isn't that huge of a deal). The question of using the internet to "fight the power" is much like the question of using guns to fight the power. In both cases, if the state really cared, they'd fuck your shit up six ways from sunday. Iran is actually a decent case study in this. They've blocked VPN access and are in the process of cutting the entire country off from the world-wide-web (having an Iran Wide Web as a replacement). How well the Iranian people will be able to circumvent these changes will demonstrate how the balance of power will tip vis-a-vis the internet when a state really decides that the freedoms of the net are too much of a burden. |
Eh, your half right. The Internet can be shut off pretty eaisly. (Though not without quite the backlash in a western country. Well until CYBER HACKERS! gets blown up to such a panic countries convince people each nation needs it's own private interent.
However guns actually does provide a pretty huge threat to the government, at least in the "dictator control" scenario. As has been shown time and time agan, guerilla warfare when less equiped can be a hell of a pain for a government and even bring it down....
and few guerillia armies would be as well armed as a US one. They'd be missing some of the heavier stuff like RPG's, but chances are such things would be aquired fairly quickly in the chaos and raids on various armories.
Considering your political science background you really should know better in this regard.








