for example, woody, mach's first ost to me is talking about DRM though I never brought up DRM in the slightest. He's arguing against a point I have not taken.
So yeah "everything he's said is countering what you've said"
Hilarious. I must have alts, then, because what he's saying is countering things I've never said, yet he's quoting me.
MY argument, since you can't seem to pay attention, isn't "you're wrong", but, "how are you right considering x, y, and z".
I am the one who is saying exactly what the article said, yet I'm being framed as someone who said things about drm, etc.









