| JayWood2010 said: Everything he has been saying has been countering what you have been saying |
You and him have something in common with making vague, unprovable sentences. Let's see some examples, chum, or it's just going to be another case of pretending words have different meanings than they do.
Mach's first post that I questioned said "OP is stating exactly what the article was saying", yet you really weren't because like the argument we've already had, your interpretation requires that MS had to have misspoken and only mistakenly referred to "downloading while afk", and generally being redundant.
You think the article makes no mention of online. You believe the always on always connected slogan was a msitake of redundancy. You believe that referring to downloading means nothing about internet despite directly following the solitary "always connected". You believe you are stating EXACTLY what the article is saying.
I'm not going to argue with someone who believes in a paradox. How can you believe you are saying the same thing as the article when your interpretation relies on them having misspoken?
