TheJimbo1234 said:
RazorDragon said:
GC's case actually didn't made any sense. It had games(1st and 3rd party), it had the controller, it had the online features, it had even an add-on that played GBA/GBC games and also GBA connection that allowed new gaming possibilities, it was the smallest and most reliable console of that generation and, most importantly for the gaming forums crowd, it had the graphics.
So, what can we conclude from all that? Gaming market makes no sense. |
It couldn't be used for media and lets be honest, the games were not new or fresh. Fable was new. Halo, DMC, GTA, PoP, SotC, ES 3, KOTOR were new games. The list is huge. Splinter Cell, Ghost recon, Killzone, Hitman, Red Faction, Time Splitters, NFS etc etc etc.
Mario, metroid, and Zelda AGAIN were not new, but simple remakes. Yawn, I'll pass thanks. When they make a new game then maybe Nintendo have a chance.
|
Really? Geist was new, Eternal Darkness was new, Pikmin, Batallion Wars, Baten Kaitos, Resident Evil 0, etc. It also had every one of these IPs you mentioned(except Killzone, which is a Sony exclusive) and many 3rd party exclusives, mostly from Sega(since DC was dead) like Sonic Adventure 1 & 2, Phantasy Star Online, Ikaruga, etc.
Your argument is invalid, except for the "it couldn't be used for media" part, which is somewhat true(if you didn't had that Panasonic GC which could play DVD movies).
