Machiavellian said:
The key people keep forgetting is that MS is a for profit company. If MS will institute a DRM system to not play used games it would demand something in return from publishers. The reason it's very doubtful that MS would require the console to be on in order to play games is that it would limit their install base. |
Are you stating what the document directly says, or making assumptions?
In tabletop games, we have two acronyms. One called RAW, and RAI.
Many times Rules As Worded end up being completely incorrect, and fixed by the developer.
Rules as Interpreted is almost wrong just the same.
So who is to say whose interpretation is better?