Dr.Grass said:
Just plain wrong. I can't explain why. I can just give you a glimpse of what dota is by referencing some of the people who play it. 1. My friend who's master architect of the biggest online purchasing company in my country has clocked over 1200 hours. 2. My friend who's a game developer has clocked over 1100 hours. He's releasing a game at the end of the year and will make millions. Bet on it. 3. His whole dev studio are all into it. 4. Me. I didn't like it at first. But then I watched him play whilst he expertly gave me the lowdown on what he was doing. SO confusing at first, but BY FAR the deepest, most balanced game I ever witnessed. I had biases too. I refused to accept it as being something possibly awesome. I was wrong. |
So what? Reminds me of a friend many years ago (who by the way was at Garching at the time - if you're going to CERN you know what I'm talking about) talking about one of his acquaintances who, upon being questioned about the people attending a certain meeting, couldn't find a humbler response than saying that "We were at least 5 geniuses..."
Anyways, the fact that a game is capable of drawing apparently rational people for hundreds of hours does not carry a lot of information about the game itself, although it does convey information about those people. IMHO.