Dodece said: @curl-6 |
This is what I gather from your reasoning:
PS360 had a more consistent flow of good games.
A good game has to have a score of 90 or more on metacritic.
You are saying that Wii didn't have a lot of fantastic first party titles, which kind of sums up the other two points you made before; PS360 had more consistent flow of good (1st party) games than Wii.
Let's just say that we're talking about exclusive games here, alright? You brought up the 1st party games criteria, but let's say that we're talking about exclusives.
PS3 had 13 games with a score at or above 90 at metacritic (even though some of them appeared on other Sony platforms)
Xbox360 had 11 games with a score at or above 90 at metacritic
Wii had 8 games with a score at or above 90 at metacritic (although some of them appeared on other Nintendo devices)
This tells us that Wii did NOT suffer from the lack of good exclusive games, like you want to make it out to have done. It got almost as many good games as Xbox360 in fact. And this isn't even talking about the 1st party line ups. This is exclusives. Now, what would happen if we took away all the 3rd party exclusives?
As far as good 1st party games are concerned, Wii had quite a few of them. Fact.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.