By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
veritaz on 18 March 2013
Edit Thread
Max King of the Wild said:
veritaz said:
If it means It's more of the same the game will probably be great just like god of war ascension is. I trust game journalists less and less when it comes to awesome games because they take off points for the stupidest reasons like how Adam Sessler took of points from GOW ascension because of a trophy name. They just try and find any reason even if the game is great, It's really pathetic.

I just read the excerpts metacritic has up:

"Judgment is literally as much fun as Gears of War 2" - 96/100 (so this reviewer liked it being similar it seems)

"Although it’s in no way game changing, Gears of War: Judgment is a fast paced, satisfyingly violent, action shooter" 88/100

"It’s solid, it’s capable, it fits with the identity of the series. In short, it’s Gears." 81/100 (now we are getting to people who don't like more of the same)

" The fact that the game doesn't offer anything significantly new is definitely a point against it, but it remains undeniably fun to play"

Theres more but I'm sure you get the picture

Yeah but i don't get it, why change something that made the game awesome in the first place? I could see it if it was the same story, places , gameplay and such but they improve on everything. If reviewers want the gameplay to change drasticly they would be complaining on that and deducting points, the only game that seems to not be affected by it is mario. It is the same formula for gameplay everytime with even the same horrible story every time but doesn't get a deducted score i wonder why.