| osed125 said: In order to attract the mainstream audience games need to be easy, if developers don't do it then most people will hate it and thus not buy it. There are some exceptions to this obviously, like the Soul's series. One of the problems I usually face up with games is that they are "difficult" (the real word should be frustrating) for the wrong reasons: bad camera, bad controls, action commands (God I hate this things so much) etc. this has been around since the NES days but I feel like more games suffer from this lately, many of my deaths in video games are because of bad design choices and not really because I suck at the game (again there are exceptions to this rule), when I fail at a game it should be because I did something wrong, not because the game did something wrong. There's also the type of "hard" games that simple put all the guys shoot at you at the same time, that imo is a really bad design choice. Devs probably just increase the accuracy of enemies AI to make it feel it's harder, but in reality this is just frustrating. This part typically applies to FPS when to put them on hard difficulty. |
funnily enough I put the Soul's series in that category. At least when I played Demon's Souls I found the levels to be extremely easy other than the ones in tunnels or small rooms where targeting an enemy would result in me being unable to see. Then I would get to a boss and die before figuring out the pattern and have to start the whole level over. It was easy to get through most of the levels if you took your time, but damn was the no checkpoint at a boss thing dumb. I'm not asking for any advantage. Give me the same health I had after going through the level and same items, just don't make me go though 50 soldiers and tediously do the same half hour level again just to get back to the only hard part. Stupid design imo.
