cbarroso09 said:
JayWood2010 said:
The problem is, nintendo has just done a very poor job transitioning into next generation and while they are playing catch up sony and MSFT are going to be miles ahead. Nintendo should have offered more memory since they have all games in the eShop. Memory is pretty cheap so this shouldnt be an issue. Making a cheap console i dont think is going to pay off like it did for the Wii in my honest opinion. |
None of the other systems did a good job transitioning to HD. It doesn't matter how good the hardware and software developers are, there will always be a problem. WIth respect to be miles behind the competition, the next thing to do is cloud storage, and that is not an option. Buying a system with a 500GB hard drive is in no way cheaper than one with a small one. Besides, Wii U is using solid state memory, they are not that cheap, so to include a 1TB hard drive in, for example, the PS4 together with all the other hardware we know it has, will be catastrophic. Sometimes it is not a matter of how much one piece cost, but the entire set of pieces. If you are telling that Nintendo offers only downloadable titles, then, yes you are right. The experienced gamers are the ones setting the bar with downloadble content so far, and I don't think it is a problem for them to plug in an external hard drive.
|
We are in 2013 now. They did it in 2005/2006
My computer is using an SSD. The WiiU should have opted out in getting more cost efficient memory with more space.
