SecondWar on 15 March 2013
Most likely a marketing ploy for the website. It gives popular games a terrible (and underserved) review and hopes will see it, think "what the hell, who are they" and then go to the website. If not he is just terrible reviewer.
The Halo 4 one contains something along the lines of "if there's anything worse than more of the same, its less of the same". This is enough to to show the review is worthless. You can either dislike things for being too similar or dislike them for being too different. This line basically says "nothing is good, everything sucks".
Given the other review scores he's given, I don't think this summary is wrong. So how can such a reviewer have there opinions be valued or considered worth listening to?
