PS4 not worth the cost says Nvidia (Read thread, not title)

[theprof00]

Lafiel said:

disolitude said:

ethomaz said:
nVidia has better tech but no option like CPU+GPU (APU)... so in the end the AMD is cheaper.

Sony did the best for the company.

Maybe not an X86 option but they have a very capable ARM SoC option in their Tegra line. 

very capable? well, the cpu cores of that are OK for smartphones/tablets (and Vita uses a custom Tegra3, with powerVR gpu cores), but not anywhere near enough for "next gen" consoles

and the Tegra's GPU cores are heavily critizised for being subpar even compared to standard ARM designs

Focus on the important thing, not the hollow names and words you're using.

PS4 - currently (and hinted to be upgraded) 1.8 Teraflops.
PS3 - 200 Gigaflops
Samsung Galaxy S4 (not yet released) - 74 Gigaflops.

 

EDIT: Oops, my bad. I see what was going on now.
@dis. Galaxy 4s uses a tegra 4.