By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
StaleCheetos on 14 March 2013
Edit Thread
glimmer_of_hope said:
StaleCheetos said:
Carl2291 said:
theshonen8899 said:

You don't seem to get the point. The PS3 was released a year after the 360. The means the PS3 has sold far more units per year than the Xbox 360. It's barely third in absolute sales (which means nothing), but second in sales per units by a wide margin, the only statistic that actually makes sense. If you REALLY want to use total sale, you'd need to add in the last year of PS2's sales to the PS3's sales to properly compare it to the 360, which is still larger.

There are more 360's sold worldwide than there are PS3's sold worldwide. Your "point" doesnt matter.

360 - 74,519,356
PS3 - 73,206,500

The PS3 is in 3rd place. No matter how many different excuses you use. No matter how much you try spin the numbers. The headstart doesnt matter. Aligned launches dont matter. Units per year doesnt matter. It doesnt matter if you want to add PS2 numbers to the PS3 total.

The PS3 is in 3rd place.

PS3. 3rd place.

3rd place.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=155676&page=1#

Dont wanna butt in here during this fine arguement. But seeing as we are on Vgchartz.....shouldnt we use Vgchartz numbers?

So does that mean that we should only use vgc numbers as a credible source? I guess by that statement any info or source outside of vgc is false?