KungKras said:
What I meant was that if playing dirty is what you consider brilliant, then you must also consider Microsoft brilliant this gen. Business wasn't covered as extensively back then as it is now. But since we have an example of Sony doing it once, it's likely they did it more than once. |
Actually I am not that concern about the "brilliant" calling back and forth. If you want me to say something about it, I guess I'll say MS was brilliant this gen, just less brilliant than Sony in the previous gens, taking what you said in consideration.
That doesn't work. You can't assure games where bought out of Sega if you don't have the info, like you had with Tomb Raider. You can't rely in your feelings and what you think happened if there isn't proof. As it stands now you could only say that Tomb Raider was an ace that helped Sony cement their advantage over Sega, I guess... But assuring that Sony bought games away from Sega is not something you can be certain, at best, you could consider the possibility but it can't be used as amo to state as a fact.
Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1