Was it 100% the same as the stuff you see in the "video" same textures same effects etc?
I know that there is screenshots of the new killzone that look better than the video (video has engine related motion blur but the screenshot is supersharp and also has a slightly different angle at the exact same place)
You know its no work at all to make a great looking game and come up with even better looking video. (its just the next step of bullshot but this time its with a video not screenshot)
I know this vid it looks awesome but my point still stands Its not guaranteed to be the game graphics. I also know that there is screenshots out there (like the one where the player lands on the border and this gunship shows up) that look sharper without motion blur. This cannot be a direct feed screenshot from the same build that was shown at the Sony presentation since the engine has motion blur and no matter how often you play the same scene there will always be this motion blur because its an ingame cutscene .
Again I am not saying that the game looks worse than the footage we see I just say that people should believe their own eyes before they say something is FACT. I actually never said the game looks worse than the videos at all :) I just said its not 100% quaranteed to be ingame footage which is true. But people argue that anyways lol.
I question most of Sony's stories/etc after what happened to the "all games 1080p/60fps 2 HDMI-port Playstation 3" and I think thats somewhat understandable and there is a WindWaker WiiU mockup video where the guy tried to sync his hands movements to the video that was shown on his gamepad and it worked 70% of the time but its okay since the guy/girl is no professional.
So even if they show Jimmy holding a controller so far away from the camera that I cannot really see what he is doing and where he randomly presses buttons it can still be a timed "show" for the audience where Jimmy knew when it was his turn to take the controller and act like he was playing it even tho it was a video. I am not saying that this happened but that this is a possibility.
So again its not proven to be ingame graphics. Since the game is not out. And that was the whole point of my comment IT IS NOT 100% proven and I dont get why people try to argue that because I did not say something wrong I actually said something that is factual.
Btw here is the WindWaker Mockup Video.
I know that this is somewhat of a stupid comment but as said before I never argued that the game looks great or anything I just said it is not 100% sure to be ingame graphics and my "conclusion" is based on facts whereas saying "its is 100% ingame graphics" is not.
Sorry for derailing but I had to tell you guys what I ment because you clearly misunderstood.
P.S. I wonder how the 2005 CGI trailer would have looked like when they would have had the effects todays games (like BF3 or Crysis 3) have. I mean Crysis1 on PC also looks great but it lacks the visual punch of modern games. Sure Crysis 1 has better geometry etc but its just missing something.
I see what you mean, and you have the right to be sceptical. Afterall the KZ2 cgi was said to have been real gameplay back when it was shown. That being said, i'm pretty sure THIS time it's a safe bet what was shown is the real deal. Especially after watching Jimmy play it, there is no way they made a video of someone playing bad and told Jimmy to just play a long :p
