By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mazty on 08 March 2013
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
Mazty said:
curl-6 said:
Mazty said:

All those games showed an improvment over the existing consoles. Not a single Wii U game shows an improvement in the slightest. In fact, a lot of the games perform worse. The fact that it's so hard to make games look better than current games should make you wonder just how much better the games will actually get. 

Trine 2 Director's Cut exceeds PS3/360 capabilities, developer Frozenbyte has confirmed this.

If you port a game made for one system onto another with a very different architecture, without taking the time and effort to optimise your work, it will perform worse. The PS3 struggled with Half Life 2 back in the day, does that make it weaker than a circa 2004 PC?

Links plx. Frankly I really couldn't tell. 

The fact that BLOPS II can be ported from the 360 to the PS3 just fine, and performs worse on the Wii U is worrying. You really can't use the excuse of different architecture when the games been ported to the freakin' cell. 

http://www.geek.com/articles/games/ps3-360-cant-cope-with-trine-2-wii-u-graphics-20121010/
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-trine-2-face-off

Developers have had 6 years to learn the PS3's architecture. They've only just had their first experienvce with Wii U's.

Uhoh:

"We also understand that the game's architectural underpinnings favour stronger graphics hardware and that the code is relatively light in terms of its CPU requirement - a good match for Wii U hardware, in other words."