pokoko said:
fordy said:
Scoobes said:
That's only rumour and I think that's a major exageration. EA want control of their own servers/distribution for their games, and by the sound of things they've managed to negotiate an arrangement with Sony and Microsoft (guess we'll see at E3).
If it's anything like the mix up with Valve, then EA want to be able to control where, when and how DLC gets released for their games. Sounds like Valve and Nintendo don't want to lose that control, let alone the potential revenue or DLC sales data.
|
I'm pretty sure the article states that EA wanted to host the Nintendo Network by themselves,, which Nintendo turned down. How would this make them lose control of their servers?
I had some proper thought about it earlier, and I'd say it was no wonder that EA were desperately trying to get Origin into the console market, considering Valve has been in the media lately about making a console of their own....
|
EA wanting to take control of Nintendo's online services is a rumor that comes from an unsubstantiated Reddit post that cites a source who was supposedly at a Kyoto meeting between Nintendo and EA. Yeah, really. The post said, "Nintendo Network and Miiverse would have to become Origin exclusive."
The internet being the internet, people have decided this must be true, despite it making absolutely zero sense.
What Scoobes said is most likely what happened. EA wanted their releases to access Origin from within the game and Nintendo declined, much as Steam did before them. I would imagine that EA worked something out with Sony and Microsoft.
|
Open to links and references if you have any...
After all, I did say before that it WAS my original perception before the article....
