By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fordy on 02 March 2013
Edit Thread
M.U.G.E.N said:
fordy said:

 

I hope YOU understand that it was you responding to the OP, not me...


You still don't get it at all. It almost seems like you're cherrypicking the parts of the post that you want to respond to while ignoring the parts that you know you have no case against.

Once again, third parties HAVE attempted to publish on Nintendo systems before. They don't just outright bitch that they can't sell games on a system without even reelasing a game on it. What you're failing to realise is that game "X" is a completely different game on one platform as it is another platform. It IS reality, it's the impression 3rd parties have given them.

For example, say Exxon Mobil opened up a big oil refinery next door to you, spouting tons of pollution, smells, etc into the air. It's noisy as hell, and operates 24 hours a day, so good luck with sleeping. Now on that matte,r wouldnt you be just a LITTLE annoyed at Exxon Mobil? Just a little? Try to understand here...


It's like talking to a wall. I was responding to the OP and I still stand by what I said. Where did I contradict this? 

Second para: It may be the case with some games. But what about those that 3rd parties have actually put some effort? What about those games with some extra content just for nintendo users? What about them? if thsoe games sell like shit then who is to blame?

Either way you are right about one thing..my comment was about specific points in the OP such as the quality of first party ninty titles. You did a marvelous job dodging my question from the previous post..then again didn't expect you to actually have an answer either. Because you understand it is such a BS statement to make and a stance to take. 

Being annoyed by some lame ass efforts of publishers doesn't make it right to make stupid statements. They have nothing to do with each other. Don't think I made any arguments against bad ports to ninty systems either. That's just in your head. I have no desire to take the feelings and past experiences the OP had to go through by playing on nintendo consoles into account when he make blanket statements about other consoles as well. 

But please...keep not getting the point or bringing in some more arguments about topics I never addressed in the first place. Tell me how you really feel


Which games are we talking about in particular? Are we talking about games released at the same time as the others, or much later, with expectations that a little extra content is going to make it sell as well as the original?

I find it hilarious that in the case of buyers vs sellers, you stick with the sellers, like for some reason people are OBLIGATED to buy games now. Is that why games on other systems sell better, because these users have some kind of a guilty conscience?

You mean your stupid question regarding that Nintendo users haven't tried other games before? This is from the same person who doesn't appear to have one Nintendo game in their VGChartz library, accusing others of not playing games on other systems? Yeah, you can probably see why I chose to ignore that.

Of course it does. In my earlier example, you'd probably be a lottle mor pissed off at Exxon Mobil than the average person in the country. If someone says "Well they're doing good things over in this region", you'd probably say "I dont give a shit. What they do elsewhere doesn't make up for the fact to the damage they've done here". THAT'S why you don't get it, and are attempting to answer it with the equivalence of "well who cares what Exxon Mobil does to you? You're just in damage control".