By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
M.U.G.E.N said:
fordy said:

Yet you seem absolutely concerned when someone mentions that perhaps Nintendo's titles are off tio high of a quality for 3rd parties to effectively compete...


Think you might have to google the definition of the word 'concerned' is.  You keep using that term but I don't think it means what you think it means. Because you are mixing that up with disagreement. I think it's absolute nonsense thinking nintendo first party is superior to another. It's a subjective matter. For example I think Sony first party games are much much better than the Nintendo first party. Doesn't make it a fact.

The notion that ninty fans somehow have a better taste than others or ninty first party games are so much better than 3rd party games or PS/360 first party games is damage control at its finest. 


You knew it was subjective, so you decided to jump in. Oh wonderful thought process!

Do you go jumping in offering your opinion at EVERY show of free speech that you don't agree with, too?

You're contradicting yourself in the same goddamn post! You just said it's subjective, yet you say that they're attempting dmaage control. How about you listen to your own advice and take it as "subjective" analogy. You're attempting to have your cake and eat it too!