By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
happydolphin said:
Train wreck said:

Your questions are not going to be answered because we do not know the makeup of the building and who were the tenants, so to go by Trucks answer is amateurish.  We still don't know what the vacancy rate of the building was and thats assuming if they had any other tenants besides themselves.  if the building was owned by Sony and housed by Sony only employees, what income could take make with no other tenants? Outside the future apperiation/depreciation of the building (which of course we do not know outside Trucks because he can see the future) there is too little information to make a grandiose condescending statement.

I'm not sure which statement was condescending (trucks'?), but it is safe to assume that Sony owned that building for internal use, and it was like that since 1968.

I'm not sure why anyone would assume the contrary.

the building was built in 2011