Article reads like some Sony fanboy wrote the history of consoles through his rose tinted glasses. I don't get the title of the article, it doesn't fit with reality.
Sony didn't kill Sega. Sega killed Sega. Long before PSone launched, Sega was already going down that path. As the article said, the DC was just too far ahead of its time. Regarding Nintendo, the article points out the lower sales of N64 and GCN compared to their Sony counterparts, but in the context of the article, shouldn't he also mention the fact that even though they sold less consoles, Nintendo made tons of money? So where does this "evolve or die" stuff come from?
MS came into the market to stop PS from becoming the centerpiece of home entertainment and they appear to still be on that path, so idk exactly how much you could say Sony has forced them to change either.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
