Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:
Talal said:
Why not create new studios with that money. I wouldn't be happy if that were true. I can accept exclusive DLC but full games is too much. |
I was just about to write the same :)
It makes a lot more sense in the long term to invest in first-party software rather than lease some high-profile EA titles for a few months.
|
They already created 10+ studios
Why can't people just read some news before reply.
|
Maybe it will help once said studios release any relevent games.
|
They talking about next-gen first party games
None of any MS studios released next-gen games(even a trailer) because MS still doesn't announce next-gen Xbox
|
But the being are that Microsoft is got many much more studios than Sony already during generation of XBox 360. But no more first party games on the console even then. In fact, much less AAA games from them than Sony.
*Am I doing it right?
|
They did not have more studios than Sony for this gen,that's why they created many studios for next gen.
Veknoid_Outcast said:
D-Joe said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:
Talal said:
Why not create new studios with that money. I wouldn't be happy if that were true. I can accept exclusive DLC but full games is too much. |
I was just about to write the same :)
It makes a lot more sense in the long term to invest in first-party software rather than lease some high-profile EA titles for a few months.
|
They already created 10+ studios
Why can't people just read some news before reply.
|
Your petulant comment notwithstanding, I assure you I'm fully away of Microsoft's investment in first-party software. I've posted about it on this very forum.
My point remains perfectly valid. It makes more sense for Microsoft to invest in first-party software rather than rent third-party software from EA. Do you disagree?
|
It makes more sence for MS to doing both,and they will.
It's even worse you already read the news but still reply something like this.
Essay Pro