Is the graphic leap to 8th gen as noticeable as previous leaps?

[Weedlab]

oni-link said:

Weedlab said:

Chark said:

I had a friend who watched KZ:SF on the PS3 Youtube app from a Standard Definition TV that he plays on. He was blown away even.

Dude it is a lost cause. I find it funny that most people who CLAIM Killzone SF's graphics are marginally better are mostly Nintendo enthusiasts (not just here but throughout the inter-web). It is wishful thinking if you think the Wii U is in the same league as the PS4/Xbox. It can't even do The Witness. xD

What's even funnier to me is how the narrative just kept changing. First there was speculation that the footage was a target render - implying that it looked too good to be real time. Now that we have established it is real time it's 'marginally better'. So which is it? :D

 

Dude calm down.  Nobody is saying Wii U is stronger or equal to PS4; it's just the margin between current top tier PS360 games and those shown for the PS4 announcement is not as pronounced as what the hype was is all.  Proof is on the eye of the beholder:

I don’t seem calm? :p I didn’t say anybody claimed the Wii U was on par with the PS4, but people are claiming it is close in power. I object to that and that’s where I focused my argument. If you checked my previous comments you will see I said nothing about which leap is bigger.  I reserved my judgment and kept my comments vague. I focused my argument on the Wii U and if it is really next gen and compared it to the PS4. In my last post I was referring to some Nintendo enthusiasts who seem beyond the reach of reason (not necessarily people in this specific thread).

 

Also, you do know that comparison is very flawed, right? (And for a number of reasons too). But I’ve been down that road too many times already so I won’t go any further. :D

Don't get me wrong I am not against the Wii U as I said earlier. I like Nintendo's games and I intend to get one, but I call a circle a circle anda  square a square.