By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
VGKing said:
CGI-Quality said:
VGKing said:
CGI-Quality said:

How is it an unrealistic set-up?

How many people actually have $500 graphics cards? Does it even matter if a $1000+ PC can overpower a PS4? I mean that would be expected, but is it worth it?

Depends on what you're using it for, but that is irrelevant in regards to what you said. It doesn't take three high-end GPUs to run that UE4 tech demo. It only took one.

Doesn't matter if its 3 or 1. The bottom line is that its still an unaffordable PC set-up.

Well thew amount of cards do matter, because it doesn't take some nasau-powered machine, the likes of what you're assuming, to run this demo. Now, if your argument is that the PC version was only possible based on a set-up that requires somewhat of a hefty income, I can dig that, though to an extent. However, you have shifted from "unrealistic" to unaffordable.

No disrespect, because I generally appreciate your posts, but the true bottom line here is while the PS4 version of this tech demo looks superb, it is behind the PC edition on a technical basis.

The way I see it unrealistic = unaffordable. The truth is that A LOT of people are gaming on integrated graphics cards, not $500 monster GPUs. So for all the boasting about how PC overpoweres PS4, although it may be true, it doesn't matter since most people don't have these powerful PCs.