Otakumegane said:
Attoyou said:
Soriku said:
JoeTheBro said:
Soriku said:
Is this a joke? Why are you using CoD3, one of the worse examples of a good looking HD title? Why not use the God of War games the same way you're comparing the Killzone games?
"Really small jump"...right.
Anyway, the jump will be smaller than this gen and next gen the jump will be even smaller than this jump, etc. The improvements will still be noticeable though.
|
Um maybe cause Cod3 was a launch title while GOW3 came out in 2010? Na, that couldn't possibly be it. You know Killzone Shadow Fall is a launch title right?
|
And you know God of War 2 was a late gen PS2 title right? And I used God of War 3 and Ascension as later gen (Ascension moreso) PS3 titles as comparisons.
Even if you compare CoD3 and Killzone as "launch title" games I don't think it's a very apt comparison. Killzone is an exclusive game playing to the strength of PS4 HW, CoD3 was a game across many systems and they weren't going to put the effort in to make it a very good looking game on PS3.
Killzone looks good but the jump from GoW2 to 3/Ascension is much bigger. There's much more detail added in between the God of War games. Don't tell me that's a "really small" jump and use an early-gen shitty multiplat game as an example.
|
Yeah. Lets do ps3 Launch titles vs ps4 launch titles
Another problem is that we have been seeing "next gen" engines and what to expect for two years, some of the excitement has rubbed off for some/clouded their judgement. Its a massive jump. Also rumors are saying it was only using 1.5Gb vram. Holy shit if true.
|
Add a PS2 launch game and we have a better comparison.
|
Unreal Tournament was the only ps2 fps game avaliable on launch. Let's take Halo CE for example
