Areym said:
It's not an outrage, you get what you pay for, right? However, I do think when your main competitor can bring their customers free online gameplay, even if it isn't as good as your own (which to be quite honest, that statement is very much up for debate) it makes you think a little. Basically, if Sony can do it, why not microsoft? Obviously, they are a business, they are out to make money, blah blah blah, you catch my drift by now. |
Sony is doing it, but can't continue to do it. Did we forget that Sony is losing money like crazy while Microsoft is making money?
"Basically, if Sony can do it, why not Microsoft?" Because Microsoft wants to make a profit and continue to be in business. Sony does too, so we'll see a shift in the way Sony handles their console business very soon, and I've got a strong feeling it's going to be something similar to how Microsoft handles their console business.
There's a reason Sony is losing money, free online gaming, giving away free games, etc. I'd like to see those of you who think Sony is doing well try to run their own business while losing hundreds of millions of dollars each quarter, and then tell me that they are the 'winning' business.
