forevercloud3000 said:
disolitude said:
Sevengen said:
Or why you'd proclaim loyalty to a gaming company that's only had 1 original idea for nearly two decades. Wait a minute, to be honest, Sony weren't the first ones to release a CD-based machine were they, so my mistake, make that 0 original ideas in nearly the past two decades. |
well to be fair sony did have an idea to sell hardware at a loss to squeeze the smaller guy. it worked until they ran in to a bigger fish willing to under cut them on price for similar hardware.
they also showed everyone how to moneyhat timed 3rd party exclusives. look at their big holiday lineup for 1995s ps1 launch, all 3rd party...battle arena toshinden wipeout destruction derby...all made it to sega saturn 6 months to a year later.
|
Sony has stated time and again, that they never paid for outright exclusivity. Beleive it or not, some business deals can be made without the exchanging of funds to persuade opinion. Sony simply talked a better game. Whether they do now is another question, as MS's raising of this standard might have forced their hand. The fact they refused to do so was part of their downfall this gen, remember?
|
paying money...talking the better game... what difference does it make? both resulted in timed exclusives... come on, i thought timed exclusives are for loser companies. only true exclusives matter.
downfall this gen has very little to do with lack of timed exclusive talk. it has to do with being a year late with similar hardware and worse features while being more expensive. only thing that saved sony was the playstation brand. if microsoft released the ps3 it would have been xbox 1 sales scenario all over again.
