Veknoid_Outcast said:
pokoko, I love you man -- you know that -- but this isn't a hateful, narrow-minded rant. It's a well-researched, well-articulated argument for a specific video game philosophy. I completely understand that you and others don't agree with it, but it's more professional than 90% of the garbage we get from video game writers. Moreover, I completely agree with him. I'm quite confident PS4 will host some great games, probably some all-time great games, but the idea that more power and fewer restrictions are what the medium needs is wrong, at least in my opinion. His comparison to movies is a good one. Have movies become better because of the creative freedom that digital effects afford? No, because the real impediment to progress is the mind of the artist, not his digital playground. And no amount of CGI, RAM, processors, or horsepower will change that. |
No, I'm sorry, but you're wrong. It's a sophomoric and bitter piece. Read it again and note all the hyperbole and insults. Note all the strawman arguments and false information. That's not professional at all.
As for the idea that improving your hardware hurts gaming, that's ridiculous. It's like saying we should take brushes away from painters and give them pieces of grass because it will make their paintings better. It's just sophistry. Not even Nintendo believes that, as every single device they've made has been more powerful than previous models.
Even then, the entire point of Sony's presentation wasn't "moar power", it was about removing artificial barriers. Are the artists themselves, the developers, complaining about the Cell being replaced by normalized PC architecture? Are they angry that more RAM lets them do what they want? If so, then I'll listen to his point, but I haven't heard anything like that.
The writer just wants gaming to fit his vision, that's all, and no other. He doesn't want explosions, he doesn't want FPS, he doesn't want anything that he won't enjoy to exist. And that's sad and hateful. I loathe people like that.