disolitude said:
In terms of PC specs, what part is misleading? Custom low power APU with 8 cores running at 1.6 Ghz + 1.84 teraflop capable GPU. We don't know the bus bandwith but memory bandwith is good... I think an Piledriver FX quad core like 4300 (4 cores at 3.8 Ghz) + overclocked 7850 represents PS4 in terms of PC specs. Obviously there is direct level access to GPU and no Windows OS running in the background which will make PS4 run games a bit better than a similar PC would. |
The fact that you make a direct comparison with normal desktop/ laptop PC's is an oversimplification of the PS4 hardware spec. You really can't do comparisons like that. This is misleading especially for people who are not clued up about PC hardware or hardware in general.
Also your rating is out of context. If the PS4 is ultimately a 10/20 PC then I would love to know what a 1/20 PC is? and what a 20/20 PC is? As a PC enthusiast myself i can guess what your implying but other poeple wont be able to. Its misleading.
In one of your other posts you also mention that this reveals what AMD is doing with low power notebooks...now im not sure if you refering to low end notebooks or literally low power notebooks but either the way...AMD will not release low power, and especially not low end notebooks with this kind of power. I thought that post was also a bit misleading as most people wont read that post in isolation of the PS4 spec.
Edit: Their will be notebooks more powerfull than the PS4 though but these will probably cost exorbitant amounts. And again wont really be comparable.
