By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cobretti2 on 22 February 2013
Edit Thread
Turkish said:
Cobretti2 said:
DanneSandin said:
Conegamer said:
Turkish said:
Just look at the reactions of 3rd parties, they're all very happy with PS4s 8GB GDDR5 ram, ram was one of the biggest bottlenecks current gen. Nintendo just let them down.

Gamecube was a beast console, in return it got many multiplats.

As I recall at E3 2011 (or even 2012?), Nintendo said that they designed the console with 3rd parties in mind, and as such there was nothing but praise for the system. Who knows what happened to cause such a change.

Nintendo gave 3rd party developers gimped dev kits?!

 

Has anyone really read what I'm saying???


so did Sony with the PS4, until the reveal they were all under the impression it had 4GB of ram.


From their reactions after the reveal, we can say they're positevely surprised.


I agree they were, however under OPS def of not letting devs knwo about the extra ram is the same as Sony changing it up on them.


What OP forgets is that devs had early dev kits, so perhaps NIntendo was still optimising/testing the hardware before releasing the other RAM to developers.

Conegamer has raised a good point, why did 3rd party who was on board praise the hardware for what it was and now don't want anything to do with it.

If locking 234mb of ram in a first dev kit is enough to piss people of CRY ME A FUCKING RIVER.

Also hasn't everyone been saying that 3rd parties are a emotionelss business (LOGICAL LEVEL HEADED) and dont get pissed off when people mentioned EA and origin debacle.  SO if these developer are a emotionless business, they should not care about the early dev kits having restrictions.