happydolphin said:
You know, the problem with violence as a diet for society is that, even if guns were removed from the equation, the more unstable would have more inspiration on other means to wreak havoc by using knives, household bombs, and any other tool they could devise for their mischeavous desires. The problem with violence as a diet is that it feeds the madman, whereas guns could be eliminated as a tool, violence is the root. |
You're argument would be more convincing if the evidence from other nation' around the world did not tear down your argument.
The best example of a nation that has banned gun's while similarly experiencing the boon in violent video game's would be Australia.
After the port Arthur masacre of 1996 gun's were either banned of very heavily regulated (in the case of hunting rifle) the number of death's buy gunshot has declined over 50% despite the coming prevalence of violent video game's.
A knife is not nearly effetive enough for someone to go on a killing spree like Sandy Hook and bomb's are complex, dangerous to the maker and not the kind of thing a mentaly inept person can put together.
And for the record gun's DO lead to people who use them becoming more violent people from a mental standpoint.
And yes i think that if you're child is mentaly unwell you should probably take the violent media (not just video game's) away from them. But given how old he was and how easy it is to use the internet it lekely would have made little to no difference.
Regulating gun's is far more easy to do than digital media.
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE