disolitude said:
yeah its quite expensive but when you need performance what can you do... i am finding that massively overclocked gtx 670 sli cant power 3 display gaming without significantly lowering settings. titan has me curious as i always wanted 120 hz monitor surround setup...but were talking about 3000 dollars after i sell my 670s and get 2 more monitors. i wish i went with 7970s to be honest as then id just get a 3rd one. latest game benchmarks have it moping the floor with the 680 and its much more overclockable to boot...for same money as 670. 3gb vs 2gb vram also makes a difference. |
This generation AMD has mopped the floor with Nvidia in price/performance. Sure the 680 and 670 were great deals when they came out, but Nvidia could never reliably produce them so they were always out of stock. AND nobody saw the mega performance increases coming. I mean I checked some old benchmarks, and my current 7970 beats early 2012's 7970 Toxic by 20%. It's like a new card at this point.
IMO Nvidia should tread carefully. A $380 7970 is equal to a $470 680 in performance (AMD just magically fixed that "Frame Latteny" that I never noticed too with 13.2). If AMD keeps up this kind of lead in price/performance for one or two generations, Geoforce will lose its highly regarded name....







