By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
disolitude said:
CGI-Quality said:

So, all-in-all, a 60% jump over the 680, but also behind the, still, best-of-the-NVIDIA-best GTX 690.

The prospect of tri SLI for these cards makes these more appealing to me than a 690. By itself 690 isn't enough to drive 3 screens. It's no secret that 690 quad SLI doesn't scale well but tri SLI witht hese cards apears to give very impressive scaling. With these cards in tri SLI, 3D vision surround @60 fps per eye or 120 fps surround may be possible...

Eh, Titan Tri SLI is only useful for that kind of push. Cent-for-cent, you get more out of a 690 than it, but the Titan will better suit a a person on the fence, and in the market, for a 680. I just don't want to spend nearly two grand on cards just to be able to SLI them, as opposed to a $1,000 690 that does it.

yeah its quite expensive but when you need performance what can you do... i am finding that massively overclocked gtx 670 sli cant power 3 display gaming without significantly lowering settings.  titan has me curious as i always wanted 120 hz monitor surround setup...but were talking about 3000 dollars after i sell my 670s and get 2 more monitors.

i wish i went with 7970s to be honest as then id just get a 3rd one. latest game benchmarks have it moping the floor with the 680 and its much more overclockable to boot...for same money as 670. 3gb vs 2gb vram also makes a difference.