If God doesnt exist then who wrote the bible ?

[DaRev]

dsgrue3 said:

DaRev said:

Honestly, yes, there is no difference,...well almost none, because I, like many religious people, believe that it takes much more 'belief' or 'faith', what you guys seem to happily call UNKNOWS or POSSIBILITIES, to believe that there is no God and that this Universe is a result of some random event.

While science is able to prove things as it goes along century by century, during its journey of finding things out it MUST apply some form of unscientific belief, which is no different than a person reading the bible and believing in the events recorded therein.

So you trying to tell me that it's easier to belief in some inexplainable Dark Matter than it is to believe that Jesus lived? Answer this as well, How did the human race begin, was there a single person from which all people came from, or where there two original persons, or however you would like to explain it?

 

that about two thousand years ago a man named Jesus lived and did tthings, things so profound that made people believe he was God, even to the point that two thousand years later people still believe.

Your devotion to ignorance is truly astounding. Several people, including myself, have now informed you that Dark Matter isn't an unknown, it was theorized and proven to exist. How you can compare a fact to a belief system and call them the same is true dedication to your quest to omit knowledge from becoming imbued in yourself. 

You question the scientific method which has brought forth nearly every scientific and technological advancement of mankind, and fail to see the issues with a Bible that wrote about a man named Jesus for which there is not a shred of contemporary evidence. Just another fable, the rest of us aren't as clueless as you, bud. 

There's no way you have any degree in science, logic, mathematics, engineering since you clearly lack any ability to reason.

Fireforgey said:

Hmmmmm proof.  As someone said before in this very thread, proof is sometimes subjective. 

 

Proof is not subjective in the context of science. In order to be proven, it must first be testable and repeatable. Meaning anyone can repeat your experiment(s) to affirm the outcome (proof).

 

Sorry I got hit a nerve pal, next time you should not respond to anything I say, how about that? But while you're sorting that mess out, let me reitterate to you that I have no qualms with Science - I'm simply apply the same reasoning and (dis)respect you apply to the Bible and the subject of religion When you show respect for religion maybe (I'm not making any promises) then I would show respect for your Dark Matter. You want me to sit here an have you shit all over the Bible, lol, tough, aint happening today pal, try me sometime next week after I've been to Church on Sundy, until then show some respect for religion and the Bible and God or stop responding to my post or come back for more, your choice.