Kynes said:
theprof00 said:
Kynes said:
theprof00 said:
Kynes said:
theprof00 said:
So according to latest Durango rumors, it looks like Crysis on max settings, and now PS4 looks like crysis 2 on max settings.
Well, we have our winner, I think... |
Lots of people would say that Crysis looks better than Crysis 2.
|
I agree. It's basically the same thing as how we currently argue whether Forza or GT has better graphics.
People have their own tastes, despite that max crysis 2 requires stronger hardware than max crysis 1.
|
Due to irrational tessellation. That requeriments don't translate to better graphics: http://techreport.com/review/21404/crysis-2-tessellation-too-much-of-a-good-thing
|
But your source says that with the dx11 update "crysis 2 became one of the most visually striking tech advanced games in the world". Though I agree with you that the increased spec requirements wasn't necessarily because of better graphics. The reviewer does say the water is probably the best water they've ever seen and the bricks are tits.
|
With more than one polygon per pixel, you better have good bricks. You can do a pong game with trillions of polygons, that wouldn't mean that the graphics are better. Maldo patch is a much better way to spend the gpu cycles and bandwidth.
|
I'm confused, are you saying crysis 2 looks better than 1 or not, because your source sure seems to think crysis 2 is a pinnacle, and not a game of pong.
As for Maldo patch, would it be safe to say that a system that can run this level of tesselation would be able to run what you're talking about?
