How would things be different with Native South Americans if the Spanish never came?

[Kynes]

Turkish said:

Kynes said:

Turkish said:
One of the biggest genocide in human history. If the Spanish/Portuguese never came, South America would've been much more richer and stronger.

You can't commit a genocide when most people die of natural causes (smallpox) and when there are lots of people in America with "latino" genes. You can't say the same of USA/Canada, but it seems that the Spaniards and the Portuguese are the killers here. A hint, we Spaniards are Caucasian, not "latinos", taking into  consideration that the word latino is used in a wrong way in USA.

Learn some history before spreading bullshit.

So you guys think you never slaughtered native Americans, never stole their riches and brought them back to your country?

No, learn to read. What I'm saying is that it isn't one of the biggest genocide in human history. That's bullshit, plain and clear, but coming from you what I could have expected. Every conqueror does bad things, but it's tiresome to see that when someone thinks of slaughters, people think in Spaniards in America. There have been tons of much bigger slaughters than what Spaniards and Portuguese did, but they aren't remembered every time people talk about conquers. Imagine what would have happened to native Americans if UK/USA would have conquered Mexico, Central and South America. They would have been treated in a much worse way, decimating them, keeping them in reserves and letting them make casinos.

A worse slaughter is what Muslims do in every place they conquer, but is something politically incorrect to say.