Tachikoma said:
A) Less power, but no overheads, so eventually once coders get used to the closed system, capable of producing better visuals - by which time a new range of PC gpu's will be available of course. Aii) Actually the 7970 and GTX680 can do 4K quite well, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-zBuiq8RTU - http://www.brightsideofnews.com/Data/2012_6_18/The-4K-Graphics-Card-Shootout/4K%20Gaming%20Chart%2011.jpg B) They most likely won't, and since the PS4 is rumored to only have a hdmi 1.4a output, the single output alone couldn't support it at anything over 24hz anyway (pretty much unplayable). It would need a HDMI 2.0 port to be able to output 4K at 60fps.
Also, "Wrong. The top GPU in the market (GTX 680/HD 7970) can run game in 4k in max setthing." AMD's HD7990 and Nvidia's GTX690 say hello. |
True, although considering the GTX680 produces already x3 TFLOPS of the rumoured performance of Durango, optimisation can only get you so far. Don't get me wrong - I'd love the next consoles to kick out GTX680 performance (it'd save me a lot of money xD) but I'm not holding my breath.
I'm a bit of an elitist. Anything less than 30 fps min for an FPS imo isn't acceptable, plus that's only on high, not ultra, so it's safe to assume playing a top-line engine maxed out from this generation isn't even possible at 4k on single GPU cards.
Yeah, that's a really good point about the HDMI port. I only imagine the PS4 as being a bluray/DVD/media upscaler rather than supporting 4k games. If publishers are backing out of Wii U support and it has a few million users, then I really can't see 4k games being released as the user base will be considerably smaller and that's pressuming the HDMI rumours aren't true...







