ethomaz said:
|
Mazty said:
I'll repeat myself:
"Either way what is your point? The next consoles, as far as I'm aware, won't even come close to the power of the HD 7970. As for the GTX 680 18 fps is wholly unacceptable."
". On a PC you can build yourself for around £800, 4K is viable,"
Do you really think the next gen consoles will have the performance of an £800 /$1200 PC? More to the point, did you read :
"While we couldn't get ultra settings to work"
If you expect an improvement over last gens graphics AND an increase in resolution to 4k, you are wholly mistaken. If they make games that play at 4k natively, then expect absolutely no improvement in graphics over this generation. Do you think that'll happen?
|
I think you are misunderstanding all.
ethomaz said:
|
Mazty said:
If you think the PS4 can game at 4k you've no idea what you're talking about. Even $1000 GPU's couldn't game at that resolution with a game with decent graphics.
|
Wrong. The top GPU in the market (GTX 680/HD 7970) can run game in 4k in max setthing.
|
And...
ethomaz said:
OP.
- The Wii U itself is cheapers because the dated hardware... the Gamepad puts the things a little high... that's the reason.
- PS4 will have 4k for movies and some PSN games but the standard will be 1080p.
- Dev cost will not change from that generation... the buget will be the same.
- PS4/Next will be MOAR powerful... 8-10x PS360.
- The evolution in graphics will define the next generation.
|
|
Lolwut?
A) The PS4 is very likely to have less power than the GTX680/HD7970.
Aii)The GTX680 isn't even capable of solid 30 fps with improved graphics this gen. Expecting an improvement in graphics and 4k resolution is unrealistic.
B) Why will PSN games have 4k resolution when very, very few people will have 4k TV's?
