Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
You notion is rediculous because you are ignoring all other factors. If we just go with what you are saying then in 2030 all TV's will be 200+".
Good one on completely ignoring the fact that I backed up my claim on finite living space.
If the article is 5 years old then you need to find a more uptodate source.
Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out.
Look at the bloody link I gave you. There isn't a market for big TV's because there isn't the room for them in Europe. Go look at an estate agent for the UK before talking about something you know absolutely nothing about. I've lived in both the US and UK and know the difference in housing size is phenomenal - you are just taking a complete guess at size.
|
Have you even read my comment? The min. viewing distance for 42" is 5ft(1.5m), for 65" 8ft (2.5m). Do you live in a container? 1m is insignificant.
If we used your logic, Americans should have 3x bigger tvs than English people because their houses are 3x bigger. I'd suggest you visit a retail chain next time and see what kind of tvs they're marketing.
|
"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "
Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*
So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*
|
I don't know about you but the only reason i'd ever want to sit at the front would be to avoid peoples heads getting in the way, other than that i'd rather sit in the middle or the back, where you don't have to strain your neck to watch, and don't have to look left and right to see the whole screen.
