Fireforgey said:
Look, about the part of it being accurate. I would trust the quotes far more than....Pretty much everything. The unforgiving extremes to which Muslim scholars take to represent the accuracy is astounding. I have never seen anything like it. Think of a Science paper with al of its refrences. Then what are those references references. And then who can vouch for the references, who passed it to whome? If ONE and I mean one of the 26 (I believe) person chain that brought these quotes is questionable, it is discarded.
The Quran was spread By the prophet Mohamed however he never wrote (although by a miracle he ended up being able to read, the part of you believing or not believing that is of no importance) the Quran. He taught it to his followers who memorized it. Then Abu Bakr Al Sediq gathered 30 of Mohamed's closest friends after his death and wrote down the Quran for the first time but not compiled of one book. The oldest known Quran that is still around today, I repeat, the first one still exists TODAY, was written by Othamn Ibn Afan and others of Mohamed's closest friends and followers.
As you said, just because I think it is unlikely doesn't mean it is impossible, but no one even considers or wonders about how a man like that could come up with one of the greatest pieces of literature ever created. Once again, people doubt if Shakespear wrote his plays for various reasons. I'm not saying I agree with them, but when you have a man as learned and educated as he, and still people doubt his credentials, why is it that an uneducated man was able to talk in such detail about the wonders of life, scientific facts unknown to the time, secrets of the world that we are still finding out about and YET....no one asks, How? I'm not saying that by it being unlikely it immeidiatly becomes the truth, but it is a question worth asking that for some strange reason, never gets asked. Probably because the answer is one that they don't want to know.
As to why it came down to Arabs in one part of the world, that is another story for another time. Also, your ideas on Muslim conquest and conquering are a bit off but I'm too tired to sit and correct everything you said now. |
The Quran's origin is no where near as clear as shakespear given the quran was supposedly written about 900 years before shakespear wrote his great works.
I find it hard to believe that he was able to read but not write given that makes absolutely no sense and he was just some madman speaking whatever thought;s popped into his delusional head and other people wrote these things down resulting in multiple quran untill they were one day compiled to avoid needless fighting over what the Quran said (which given the current middle east failed tremendously) and that lead to a book that contain's multiple contradiction's.
If part of the Quran is wrong than that leaves the strong possibility that all of it was wrong.
Just go to http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/ and you will see how many errors are in the Quran. Just because the Quran was consistent over time does not mean it wasnt consistently wrong.
And to the point that the story of why god only told one man all of what was in the Quran being a story for another day is simply you not having an answer that does not sound nonsensical and cruel on god's part. Not to mention that it took him a while to get the message out there considering how long people had been in existence.
And yes Muhammad did use force to spread islam and was married to a six year old and had sex with her at age nine.
There is a reason why it seems unlikely he did not write it alone because he simply did not do it alone.
I also find the fact that you believe the Quran in spite of contradictions and the evil god of the Quran who supposedly taunt's people by giving them only one prophet then sending no message since incredibly stupid.
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE







