By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mazty on 10 February 2013
Edit Thread
ethomaz said:

Mazty said:

I specified 60 FPS did I not?

Dropping below 30 FPS is not acceptable. 
Not even passing 45 is not a good show.

If the game played like butter then why do competitive FPS' insist on 60 FPS minimum...?

Either way what is your point? The next consoles, as far as I'm aware, won't even come close to the power of the HD 7970. As for the GTX 680 18 fps is wholly unacceptable.

That's how the game run in consoles... 30fps with some drops to 20fps.

CoD is 60fps with drops to 40 or less.

Again your afirmation is just wrong... GTX 680 / HD 7970 can run games in 4k... more games: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-4k-gaming


I'll repeat myself:
"Either way what is your point? The next consoles, as far as I'm aware, won't even come close to the power of the HD 7970. As for the GTX 680 18 fps is wholly unacceptable."

". On a PC you can build yourself for around £800, 4K is viable,"

Do you really think the next gen consoles will have the performance of an £800 /$1200 PC? More to the point, did you read :

"While we couldn't get ultra settings to work"

If you expect an improvement over last gens graphics AND an increase in resolution to 4k, you are wholly mistaken. If they make games that play at 4k natively, then expect absolutely no improvement in graphics over this generation. Do you think that'll happen?